Yaacov comments on The Blue-Minimizing Robot - Less Wrong

162 Post author: Yvain 04 July 2011 10:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (159)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gurkenglas 03 December 2013 01:30:49AM 3 points [-]

At best, you could say that it prefers state [I SEE BLUE AND I SHOOT] to state [I SEE BLUE AND I DON'T SHOOT]. But that's all.

No; placing a blue-tinted mirror in front of him will have him shoot himself even though that greatly diminishes his future ability to shoot. Generally a generic program really can't be assigned any nontrivial utility function.

Comment author: Yaacov 31 January 2016 01:53:17AM *  0 points [-]

Destroying the robot greatly diminishes its future ability to shoot, but it would also greatly diminishes its future ability to see blue. The robot doesn't prefer 'shooting blue' to 'not shooting blue', it prefers 'seeing blue and shooting' to 'seeing blue and not shooting'.

So the original poster was right.

Edit: I'm wrong, see below

Comment author: Gurkenglas 03 February 2016 01:19:16PM 1 point [-]

If the robot knows that its camera is indestructible but its gun isn't, it would still shoot at the mirror and destroy only its gun.