timtyler comments on Time and Effort Discounting - Less Wrong

38 Post author: Yvain 07 July 2011 11:48PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: rwallace 08 July 2011 06:47:26AM 5 points [-]

Apart from the uncertainty about whether an agency will deliver a future reward at all, there is also the expenditure of resources in keeping track of and following up on a debt. If you have to keep track of a debt for a year, and take action to claim it at the end of that time, that could very well cost more than $50 worth of time and energy, particularly when you take into account the need to spend resources retaliating if the debtor fails to pay. I think it is much more plausible that people use ad hoc heuristics developed to deal with these issues, than that we actually use a hyperbolic discount function.

Comment author: timtyler 08 July 2011 08:19:23AM 0 points [-]

I think it is much more plausible that people use ad hoc heuristics developed to deal with these issues, than that we actually use a hyperbolic discount function.

Those issues seem pretty common. Why would nature not use hyperbolic discounting - and then use ad hoc heuristics to patch it in cases where it doesn't apply?

Comment author: rwallace 08 July 2011 04:04:21PM 0 points [-]

Yeah, the paper Yvain linked, seems to be providing evidence that a hyperbolic discount function may be the first-order heuristic for handling such issues, with patches applied where appropriate.