Let's talk about the dna some more once you guys have finished translating the relevant parts of the independent report, then, if your argument hinges on details of the independent report rather than just the conclusions.

The translation is now nearing completion (the clasp section is finished, and the knife section will be soon). Here, furthermore, are some relevant links:

• Expert commentary on C-V report: http://forensicdnaconsulting.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/understanding-the-independent-dna-experts%E2%80%99-report-in-the-amanda-knox-case-part-i/
• Article detailing contamination issues and other problems with DNA testing: http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/0/6285f6867724e1e685257124006f9177
• Examples of laboratory fraud and how they were detected: http://www.bioforensics.com/conference05/FBS_Dayton_2005_Fraud.pdf
• 9 DNA experts sign open letter critiquing evidence near the end of the first trial: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18215-knox-murder-trial-evidence-flawed-say-dna-experts.html
• Chris Halkides' blog: http://viewfromwilmington.blogspot.com