= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Morendil comments on Follow-up on ESP study: "We don't publish replications" - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (50)
One idea to compensate for such effects: journals dedicated to negative results. Here is one I know of in the computer science field, with links to more.
I got an advertisement for the All Results Journals the other day.
The problem isn't so much about being published but about being published in a journal with a decent impact factor. It's likely that your journal for negative results gets few citations and there has a low impact factor.