Vaniver comments on Stanford Prison Retrospective - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Prismattic 14 July 2011 01:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (7)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Vaniver 14 July 2011 01:16:02PM 1 point [-]

I felt that throughout the experiment, he knew what he wanted and then tried to shape the experiment—by how it was constructed, and how it played out—to fit the conclusion that he had already worked out.

From John Mark, one of the day guards.

A follow-up study in 2007 should not surprise anyone who knows a bit of psychology: when you ask for students to participate in a study about prison life, you get a different subset of people.

Comment author: gwern 14 July 2011 11:02:34PM 2 points [-]

Which leads to some interesting problems for anyone who accepts the results but interprets them as self-selection - if 'power attracts the corruptible', then how do you fill positions of power?

Comment author: Vaniver 14 July 2011 11:51:12PM 2 points [-]

Why, with your close personal relations.

Seriously, you try and make corruption costly. Make the uniforms in your casino have no pockets. A system that can do well enough with bad apples is generally more robust than a system that needs good apples.