MixedNuts comments on Well, that does it, I suppose - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (39)
I haven't seen anyone calling transsexuality a delusion, only people examining the possibility, and people (who agree with the standard pro-trans positions on policy) declaring the question meaningless. The closest is knb's claims about autogynephilia, which look like an independent reinvention and are thus pretty interesting evidence. In particular, I haven't seen any claims that transpeople should be denied anything.
It sounds like you're offended when people ask "Is transsexuality a delusion?", not just when they say it's one. That's not good at all, for the obvious reasons that if you can't attack n idea you can never prove it, that politics is the mind-killer, etc.
I'm aware of Bad Things that can happen from simply asking questions - they tend to prime you emotionally, even if you don't consciously notice and have the best intent in the world (and even if you're a Martian and thus immune to this effect it affects onlookers). So if you see people sneaking in evil connotations, please complain.
But I'm trans, so if I (in particular, or along with all transpeople) am deluded, I sure as hell want to know.
I don't think using the word delusion is helpful here. It's more useful I believe to break down words like gender, woman, man, etc. in order to find what people are ACTUALLY talking about. If someone says they are a woman, to some people it does not matter if they have a penis or were born XY, but to others it does, and it's much easier to discuss it in this fashion rather than to ask whether they "truly" are a woman or are just "deluding" themselves.