3rd Edit: -15 Pretty clear that I'm wrong .

The main problem isn't that you're wrong in your conclusion (though I think you are) , but that you don't bother telling us how the evidence ought lead to that conclusion. You just make unsupported assertions both in your claims of what is, and your claims of what people ought do.

LessWrong is a site about refining the art of rationality -- in both the discovery of truth, and the pursuit of utility. Explain to us how your conclusions are correct about the former and the latter: don't just make unsupported assertions and expect us to applaud.