Pablo_Stafforini comments on Degrees of Radical Honesty - Less Wrong

30 Post author: MBlume 31 March 2009 08:36PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (50)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 01 April 2009 01:54:23AM *  3 points [-]

Kant's philosophy was criticized on exactly these grounds, i.e. that by his system, when the authorities come to your door to look for a friend you're harboring, you should turn him in. I briefly scanned for clever Kant references (e.g. "introduce the brownshirts to your strangely-named cat, Egorial Imperative") but found none. Kant clarified that he did not think it immoral to lie to authorities looking to execute your friend.

The critic was Benjamin Constant. He wrote:

The moral principle stating that it is a duty to tell the truth would make any society impossible if that principle were taken singly and unconditionally. We have proof of this in the very direct consequences which a German philosopher has drawn from this principle. This philosopher goes as far as to assert that it would be a crime to tell a lie to a murderer who asked whether our friend who is being pursued by the murderer had taken refuge in our house.

For Kant's reply, see his essay On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns.

Comment author: thomblake 03 April 2009 03:36:37PM 1 point [-]

Thanks for the citation - that's actually exactly the sort of thing that informed the background of my original comment, but didn't have time to look it up. Though I was of course at the time addressing a virtue ethics reading of the problem, not a Kantian one.