A new peer reviewed article came out from NASA showing that the models used to predict temperature changes, and the ecological issues as a result of these changes, greatly differ from observed data.
Yes, it was. I was distracted by pretty words like NASA and peer reviewed, and assumed the author of the news article would faithfully report what the paper said. Stupid of me (no sarcasm).
A new peer reviewed article came out from NASA showing that the models used to predict temperature changes, and the ecological issues as a result of these changes, greatly differ from observed data.
News Article: http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
Actual Paper: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1603/pdf