TheOtherDave comments on Modularity and Buzzy - Less Wrong

24 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 04 August 2011 11:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: EvelynM 04 August 2011 02:17:29PM 5 points [-]

"Although many people understand on one level that this is false, the intuition of a special observer keeps reasserting itself in various guises. As the philosopher Jerry Fodor writes: ”If... there is a community of computers living in my head, there had also better be somebody who is in charge; and, by God, it had better be me.” "

I have built a business. It has customers, employees, office space, tax returns, vendors.... It has a separate name and existence from me. It operates according to compatible, but distinct, purposes, opportunities and choices to mine. And, if I accomplish my goal, it will operate even more independently in the future than it does now, and may at some point, exist entirely separate from me. But, I'm not tempted to attribute an "I" to it.

When a system achieves sufficient complexity, we have a tendency to reify it. I don't know what that bias is called.

Thanks for the article.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 04 August 2011 03:09:58PM -2 points [-]

When a system achieves sufficient complexity, we have a tendency to reify it. I don't know what that bias is called.

Me neither, but the fundamental attribution bias is (I think) related to it.

That is, I suspect that the same mechanisms that leave me predisposed to treat an observed event as evidence of a hypothesized attribute of an entity (even when it's much more strongly evidence of a distributed function of a system) also leave me predisposed to treat the event as evidence of a hypothesized entity.

Labels aside, it's not a surprising property: when it came to identifying entities in our ancestral environment, I suspect that false negatives exerted more negative selection pressure than false positives.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 04 August 2011 06:46:06PM 2 points [-]

I think the tendency to treat events as evidence of entities more than is warranted is called "agency bias," or "delusions of agency" when it's unusuallly strong.

Comment author: lessdazed 05 August 2011 02:01:49AM 4 points [-]

Sometimes called promiscuous teleology.

Comment author: EvelynM 06 August 2011 02:22:42AM 0 points [-]

Thank you.

Comment author: EvelynM 06 August 2011 02:22:33AM 0 points [-]

Thank you.