TrE comments on Towards a New Decision Theory for Parallel Agents - Less Wrong

4 Post author: potato 07 August 2011 11:39PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: TrE 08 August 2011 05:26:03AM 1 point [-]

A useful example is smokers that are quitting. Some part of their brains that can do complicated predictions doesn't want its body to smoke. This part of their brain wants to avoid death, i.e., will avoid death if it can, and knows that choosing the possible outcome of smoking puts its body at high risk for death.

I'm not even sure if this exact part of the brain wants to avoid death; maybe it's more complicated, and we have to introduce a third agent for that specific value (note that some say death might be a good thing, although they try to avoid it at all costs if necessary. This shows that the reasoning part of the brain doesn't automatically try to avoid death).

Comment author: potato 08 August 2011 06:35:17AM *  1 point [-]

But there is some part that wants nicotine, and as such wants the body to have a cig, and some part that doesn't want to die, and as such wants the body to avoid smoking, that's all that's required.

Comment author: TrE 08 August 2011 06:30:36PM 1 point [-]

Well, the connection between "I want to live" and "I'm probably going to die earlier if I smoke" has to be drewn somewhere, and if this requires an extra agent, things get more complicated. The brain is a mess anyway, I just wanted to make the remark that it might be even messier than it appears at a second look.