minderbinder comments on [LINK} Bayes' Theorem in New York Times - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Dorikka 07 August 2011 03:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (9)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: minderbinder 07 August 2011 05:45:24AM 0 points [-]

If the book turns out to be good, it could be a good way to "spread the word," seeing as there doesn't seem to be a lot of Bayesian literature for the layman out there

Comment author: David_Gerard 07 August 2011 04:18:12PM *  -1 points [-]

I'm slowly working through a couple of statistics textbooks. They're about second-year level and they're, ah, heavy going. If there was something rigorous but less painful I'd be onto it like a shot.

Comment author: XFrequentist 09 August 2011 08:48:43PM 1 point [-]

This then this!

Comment author: David_Gerard 13 August 2011 11:44:33PM 0 points [-]

(cough) those are the ones I meant ;-)

Comment author: XFrequentist 09 November 2011 08:18:37PM 1 point [-]

Then how about this?

Comment author: David_Gerard 17 November 2011 07:52:37PM 1 point [-]

It's got puppies on the front! It must be friendly and easy! :-D

Thanks :-)

Comment author: XFrequentist 17 November 2011 09:26:07PM 0 points [-]

Ha, I had the same thought! No prob, enjoy!