No. Something like "Bayesian reasoning is better than science" would work.

In http://lesswrong.com/lw/qa/the_dilemma_science_or_bayes/ Yudkowsky argues that you have to choose and that sometimes science is just plainly wrong. I find his arguments persuasive.

Not "thousands". "Astronomically many" would work.

Geez, I said "fraction of a second" for a reason.

That's the accelerating change, not the intelligence explosion school of singularity. Only the latter is popular around here.

Of course. And the accelerating change school of singularity provides the deadline. Friendly AI has to be solved BEFORE computers become so fast moderately intelligent people can brute force an AI.