I interpret your first post as motivated on a need to voice your disagreement, not motivated based on the expected utility of the post for the community.

Causation in general and motivation in particular don't work like that.

All of my past experiences, excepting none--->me--->my actions

more general or more correct phrasing is not.

Maybe we can think of something.

I don't feel that strongly about it

I think it is important to keep track of meta levels when talking about beliefs and their relationship to reality.

I think you should stick to doing either of the two sorts of lists I suggested. You say you thought only a single disclaimer was needed, but at least two are:

Besides, the scientific method is wrong because it is in conflict with probability theory. Oh, and probability is created by humans, it doesn't exist in the universe.

This is a good example of a false belief resembling a LW one. Looking at it tells me a bit about how others might see a LW belief as radical and false, though not everything as I can see how it isn't a LW belief.

It is possible to run a person on Conways Game of Life. This would be a person as real as you or me, and wouldn't be able to tell he's in a virtual world because it looks exactly like ours.

This is a good example of a true belief phrased to sound unpersuasive and stupid. Looking at it tells me a bit about how others might see a LW belief as radical and false, though not everything as I can see how it is true.