syllogism comments on The Ethical Status of Non-human Animals - Less Wrong

9 Post author: syllogism 09 January 2012 12:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (87)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: syllogism 09 January 2012 04:59:22PM 2 points [-]

It's not really any different, no. I suppose the aesthetic analogue would be trying to generalise from my own preferences to what I thought other people would like. There would be a difference between my own tastes, and how I was defining "good". Mapping back to ethics, there's a distinction between my own preferences (i.e. the predictors of my actual actions), and my sense of how the best world might be defined if I gave myself no more stake in deciding things than anyone else.

There's no objective reason for caring about the latter more than the former. I just do, and other people seem to care a lot too.