syllogism comments on The Ethical Status of Non-human Animals - Less Wrong

9 Post author: syllogism 09 January 2012 12:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (87)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: syllogism 09 January 2012 05:14:00PM 0 points [-]

I'm (mostly) not my genes. Remember I don't see a big difference between flesh-me and brain-emulation-me. These two entities share no DNA molecules. But sure I probably do somewhat imperfectly, by proxy, weight genes in themselves, kin selection and all that has probably made sure of it.

Right, sorry. The genes tack was in error, I should've read more closely.

I think I've understood the problem a bit better, and I'm trying to explain where I think we differ in reply to the "taboo" comment.