We could cover this by a specifically geared "how to learn to think" FAQ or a short sequence.
But I don't know, what I've been missing on LessWrong, what makes me sometimes doubt I'm actually becoming less wrong, is something like series of "rationality tests", perhaps a written exam an interactive online test or learning software or something. I think it would compliment useful projects (like say levelling IRL, ect.) and regular debate rather nicely.
We could cover this by a specifically geared "how to learn to think" FAQ or a short sequence.
I think that's what I'm going to do. I'm going to re-tool this post so that it is immediately useful as a source of basic information, and also provokes discussion of these questions.
I've been on Less Wrong since its inception, around March 2009. I've read a lot and contributed a lot, and so now I'm more familiar with our jargon, I know of a few more scientific studies, and I might know a couple of useful tricks. Despite all my reading, however, I feel like I'm a far cry from learning rationality. I'm still a wannabe, not an amateur. Less Wrong has tons of information, but I feel like I haven't yet learned the answers to the basic questions of rationality.
I, personally, am a fan of the top-down approach to learning things. Whereas Less Wrong contains tons of useful facts that could, potentially, be put together to answer life's important questions, I really would find it easier if we started with the important questions, and then broke those down into smaller pieces that can be answered more easily.
And so, that's precisely what I'm going to do. Here are, as far as I can tell, the basic questions of rationality—the questions we're actually trying to answer here—along with what answers I've found:
Q: Given a question, how should we go about answering it? A: By gathering evidence effectively, and correctly applying reason and intuition.