orthonormal comments on Decision Theory Paradox: PD with Three Implies Chaos? - Less Wrong

19 Post author: orthonormal 27 August 2011 07:22PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: orthonormal 28 August 2011 03:40:53AM 2 points [-]

Gung'f abg dhvgr evtug, yrffqnmrq; va gur fvghngvba jvgu GQGf naq QrsrpgObgf, gur GQGf jbhyq vapernfr gurve cbchyngvba snfgre va gur ybat eha vs gurl ershfrq gb nyybj QrsrpgObgf gb serr-evqr. Nyfb, vs gurl qvq fb, gurve cebcbegvba jbhyq evfr gb bar vafgrnq bs fgvpx ng bar unys.

Comment author: lessdazed 28 August 2011 03:42:53AM *  0 points [-]

Good point. I missed that since the number goes to infinity as the trials do regardless.

If you could devise a problem where the obvious flaw in "GQG fubhyq orng gur fbpxf bss bs QrsrpgObgf va nal snve svtug." alone would be implicated, that would be good, since it really is a different one than snvyvat gb ybbx nurnq.