wedrifid comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 8 - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Unnamed 25 August 2011 02:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (653)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 29 August 2011 07:20:06AM 4 points [-]

Perhaps a fund which actually increases the net MoR chapters written. For, you know, the MoR readers who actually picked up some hints of rationality during their reading.

Comment author: lessdazed 29 August 2011 07:34:20AM 2 points [-]

If that existed, it'd be more work, and it would siphon money from the first (two) fund(s).

Comment author: wedrifid 29 August 2011 01:37:21PM 1 point [-]

If that existed, it'd be more work, and it would siphon money from the first (two) fund(s).

Err... yes. But the current fund is insulting by its very existence. A 'reward' of something that provides no value (slightly altering a release schedule?) is a discouragement to donation, relative to just 'please give money if you liked it'. More MoR for money, on the other hand, would be following that glorious principle of exchanging money for goods or services.

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 29 August 2011 01:51:38PM 7 points [-]

More MoR for money, on the other hand, would be following that glorious principle of exchanging money for goods or services.

As his author notes in the profile page mentioned, there's at least some people who argue that Eliezer went too far by even the mere offer of an altered schedule in exchange for donations -- right now I think their argument is extremely weak, however Eliezer would probably be treading actually murky waters if he had people give him money for the fanfiction itself (instead of the minor convenience of a quicker schedule).

Comment author: wedrifid 29 August 2011 01:54:33PM 7 points [-]

Oh, right. Laws. They totally slipped my mind. Yeah, he should have gone with just accepting donations.

Comment author: lessdazed 29 August 2011 09:09:47PM *  2 points [-]

A 'reward' of something that provides no value (slightly altering a release schedule?) is a discouragement to donation

Ever been addicted to anything?

Comment author: wedrifid 30 August 2011 12:47:26AM *  3 points [-]

Ever been addicted to anything?

Insert ceteris paribus into the grandparent.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 31 August 2011 09:31:56PM 3 points [-]

<tongue partially in cheek> Ceteris is not paribus. Several readers complained of withdrawal symptoms during the hiatus. </tongue partially in cheek>