wedrifid comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 8 - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Unnamed 25 August 2011 02:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (653)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 September 2011 06:18:19AM 12 points [-]

77: I didn't read the title in full before I read the chapter. I must admit that "Sunk Costs" weren't a lesson that sprung to my mind as I read. Since sunk costs are such an important lesson to convey I rather hope there is another chapter on the subject. It strikes me as something that is easy to contrive scenarios to illustrate.

Comment author: Raemon 07 September 2011 05:41:53PM 3 points [-]

Similar reaction here.

Comment author: bogdanb 03 April 2012 02:44:39PM *  2 points [-]

I was actually wondering more about the “Interlude with the Confessor” part. Is it non-obvious only to me? There’s a chapter with that name in Three Worlds Collide, but other than both containing a private dialogue between two people of different ages I don’t quite see the relation.

Comment author: Dorikka 07 September 2011 09:47:14PM 2 points [-]

I also was left thinking at the end "Where are the sunk costs?"

Comment author: JoshuaZ 07 September 2011 10:00:47PM 3 points [-]

The sunk costs are what Snape has done and the costs to him and his life.

Comment author: Dorikka 08 September 2011 12:54:11AM 6 points [-]

So, it's that Snape isn't fixing his life because he's bummed out about sunk costs?

Comment author: JoshuaZ 08 September 2011 12:58:12AM 0 points [-]

That does seem to be the implication. However, he may actually decide to fix it.

Comment author: wedrifid 09 September 2011 02:16:07AM 1 point [-]

That does seem to be the implication. However, he may actually decide to fix it.

Where 'he' hopefully means 'Eliezer'.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 09 September 2011 02:46:03AM 0 points [-]

Huh? He means the fictional character Snape. That is, I hope that in the narrative Snape will decide to fix it.

Comment author: wedrifid 09 September 2011 02:51:58AM *  3 points [-]

Whereas through playing on ambiguity I am hoping that Eliezer will put something in the story about actual sunk costs, which Snape's story does not currently qualify as! As of right now the story is broken.

Comment author: TobyBartels 09 September 2011 12:59:18PM 3 points [-]

Or alternatively, the title is broken.

Comment author: wedrifid 09 September 2011 01:46:04PM 1 point [-]

Yes, a two word fix right there!

Comment author: JoshuaZ 09 September 2011 02:55:59AM 3 points [-]

Ah yes. This makes sense. In that context I agree with your statement as well.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 September 2011 10:32:49PM 4 points [-]

That's the closest thing to a sunk cost in the chapter but it just doesn't quite fit. It's somewhere just outside the borders of sunk costs and sour grapes.