= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Dorikka comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 8 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (653)
I also was left thinking at the end "Where are the sunk costs?"
The sunk costs are what Snape has done and the costs to him and his life.
So, it's that Snape isn't fixing his life because he's bummed out about sunk costs?
That does seem to be the implication. However, he may actually decide to fix it.
Where 'he' hopefully means 'Eliezer'.
Huh? He means the fictional character Snape. That is, I hope that in the narrative Snape will decide to fix it.
Whereas through playing on ambiguity I am hoping that Eliezer will put something in the story about actual sunk costs, which Snape's story does not currently qualify as! As of right now the story is broken.
Or alternatively, the title is broken.
Yes, a two word fix right there!
Ah yes. This makes sense. In that context I agree with your statement as well.
That's the closest thing to a sunk cost in the chapter but it just doesn't quite fit. It's somewhere just outside the borders of sunk costs and sour grapes.