Sorry about that. Due to the brevity of my original comment, I was thinking of the entire thing as my vote so felt it should go in the poll. I realized after seeing your comment that even this short statement would have more effect on which way others voted than just seeing the top few votes. So I've since separated my comment from my vote and also given a lengthier comment in the comment section.
No problem, its my fault since I should have put that into the instructions originally. Thank you!
This is thread where I'm trying to figure out a few things about signalling on LessWrong and need some information, so please immediately after reading about the two individuals please answer the poll. The two individuals:
A. Sees that an interpretation of reality shared by others is not correct, but tries to pretend otherwise for personal gain and/or safety.
B. Fails to see that an interpretation of reality is shared by others is flawed. He is therefore perfectly honest in sharing the interpretation of reality with others. The reward regime for outward behaviour is the same as with A.
To add a trivial inconvenience that matches the inconvenience of answering the poll before reading on, comments on what I think the two individuals signal,what the trade off is and what I speculate the results might be here versus the general population, is behind this link.