TraderJoe comments on Polyhacking - Less Wrong

75 Post author: Alicorn 28 August 2011 08:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (603)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 28 August 2011 06:45:13PM *  9 points [-]

Polyamory, especially the "open mesh" kind, dissolves the question of whether there exists a better match, or (most of) the fear of losing a partner to someone better. It's no longer necessary to consider whether this match outranks alternatives you haven't yet encountered, for both of you. It's sufficient to consider whether it works in itself.

If the hypergamy hypothesis is correct this isn't so at all.

Also consider these stats from the CDC:

Percent of all women 15-44 years of age who have had three or more male partners in the last 12 months, 2002: 6.8%

Percent of all men 15-44 years of age who have had three or more female partners in the last 12 months, 2002: 10.4%”

“Median number of female sexual partners in lifetime, for men 25-44 years of age, 2002: 6.7 Percent of men 25-44 years of age who have had 15 or more female sexual partners, 2002: 29.2%

Median number of male sexual partners in lifetime, for women 25-44 years of age, 2002: 3.8 Percent of women 25-44 years of age who have had 15 or more male sexual partners, 2002: 11.4%

Comment author: TraderJoe 27 April 2012 10:41:35AM *  2 points [-]

[comment deleted]

Comment author: TraderJoe 27 April 2012 10:43:34AM *  2 points [-]

[comment deleted]

Comment author: SusanBrennan 27 April 2012 01:17:04PM 2 points [-]

every time a male has sex with a female, both of their opposite-sex partners rise by one.

Just to ensure clarity, you meant to say; "every time a male has sex with a new female [partner], their opposite-sex partners rise by one. Correct?

One other thing which could skew the statistics is the fact that people that have had many sexual relationships can die, and the dead are not often counted in statistical surveys, while some of their partners might be.

Comment author: TraderJoe 27 April 2012 02:05:03PM *  1 point [-]

[comment deleted]

Comment author: ciphergoth 27 April 2012 02:29:09PM 1 point [-]

The true mean values should be close, but the medians etc can be very different.

Comment author: thomblake 27 April 2012 02:08:24PM 0 points [-]

Therefore, every study has been wrong.

While I agree that some attempt should be made to explain the data, it's a bit much to say it's "wrong". There's no real fault in just reporting the results you actually got without speculation, and there might well be a good explanation.

in general I mistrust surveys to give accurate data.

That is a good heuristic.

Comment author: TraderJoe 27 April 2012 03:11:57PM *  2 points [-]

[comment deleted]