byrnema comments on Bayesian Reasoning Applied to House Selling: Listing Price - Less Wrong

1 Post author: byrnema 26 August 2011 11:43PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: byrnema 28 August 2011 05:22:53PM *  1 point [-]

Excellent. This is an example of the usefulness of Bayesian reasoning, and it can be generalized to any situation where you are trying to use an observation of the form 'it-hasn't-happened-yet' to update your estimate of it's rate of occurring.

So, paraphrasing what you said, I first choose a reasonable range of probabilities for something-happening and a very rough estimate of my probabilities for those probabilities over that range. (For example, I think my house would sell in between 1 out of 50 and 1 out of 10 showings, and the probability should increase linearly over that range with some slope.) Second, each observation that something-hasn't-happened should update my probabilities as you described.

This is very interesting to me, that I can do something with the 'information' I get after each showing without an offer, and these calculations give me something to do while I'm waiting. (Besides continuing to stage my house, which I continue to work on as well even though I suspect I am in the region of diminishing marginal returns for that.)

Comment author: Vaniver 08 September 2011 07:12:17PM 1 point [-]

I finally formatted my spreadsheet as a google doc; you can find it here.

Comment author: lessdazed 28 August 2011 08:29:31PM 0 points [-]

Note! See represenatativeness. Don't think anything is wrong if it doesn't sell after 50 showings.