thomblake comments on "Robot scientists can think for themselves" - Less Wrong

-3 Post author: CronoDAS 02 April 2009 09:16PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 03 April 2009 06:53:17PM 1 point [-]

You are channeling too much certainty through the reference to authority. We are too far away from seeing the solution to describe its form in detail, much less to defer to the popular perception.

Rather in line with my point. To claim that this is not really related to general-purpose AI, when people who build the closest things to thinking machines that we have would disagree with that sentiment, did not seem warranted. I was showing that the statement was without merit due to informed folks thinking otherwise.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 03 April 2009 07:01:43PM *  0 points [-]

Err, my point is obviously that the AI researchers are too far away from seeing the solution, so their opinion shouldn't count as anything approaching certainty. This is to point out the falsity of connotation of your original comment. Not to mention that there is actually no consensus among the experts, a factual error in your statement.