prase comments on How likely is Peter Thiel's investment into seasteading to pay off? - Less Wrong

14 [deleted] 30 August 2011 04:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (140)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: prase 03 September 2011 05:05:14PM *  3 points [-]

So which of these six assertions do you suggest is obviously unreasonable.

That's a question for Mercy, but it can be that (s)he finds unreasonable all except the fifth. No.5 is the only obviously reasonable one.

Note that 6 is not a position taken by Mencius, but rather an uncharitable inference, you are arguing that if what Mencius says is true, then the Palestine lobby is much stronger than the Israeli lobby, which obviously it is not.

I have paraphrased that for brevity. Still can't think about meaning of "A is a piece of dental floss compared to the arm-thick steel cable that is B" significantly different from "A is much weaker than B".

Comment author: sam0345 04 September 2011 05:50:56AM *  2 points [-]

"A" is not the (entirely nonexistent and wholly unnecessary) Palestinian lobby. It is Harvard and the state department.

Comment author: prase 04 September 2011 08:55:23AM *  1 point [-]

B, not A. Anyway, have you read the original quotation by Moldbug? Here is the relevant sentence, for your convenience:

Even in the last case, the "Israel lobby" is a piece of dental floss compared to the arm-thick steel cable that is the Palestine lobby.

Palestine lobby is written explicitly there, and it's even not in quotation marks as "Israel lobby" is.

I'm sorry, but this is not a reasonable debate. I retreat.

Comment author: sam0345 04 September 2011 01:39:50PM 2 points [-]

Moldbug also says the Palestine lobby does not exist. You are taking a fragment out of context.