I see you plan to insist on this policy of insults and attempts at knocking the other person's status, whenever you're asked to offer arguments instead.

You and Constant have not been able to produce a coherent functional philosophy about what constitutes "harm" to people. Repeatedly we give you counterexamples that prove your arguments false. That prove that modern human intuitions about harm coincide little with reproductive success.

To this you only repeat (time and again): "But natural selection produced us, so they necessarily need to." Which is blatantly obvious in the first part, and blatantly false in the second part.

Natural selection produced us, but no they don't need to. With numerous examples and thought experiments we show you how the human concept of "harm" does NOT correspond to reproductive success. That modern people do not consider contraception "harm". That modern people do consider sexual slavery bad.

To this you, sam, only have insults to offer. Your philosophy fails both to correspond with reality, and in regards with any few falsifiable predictions it offers, it FAILS at them too.

tldr; Go away and don't return until you learn that beliefs should seek to correspond with reality (not with Darwin), and that language should be used to communicate meaning, not insults.