Navanen comments on [SEQ RERUN] What is Evidence? - Less Wrong

4 Post author: MinibearRex 05 September 2011 05:57AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (9)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Navanen 18 December 2012 04:16:13AM 1 point [-]

Is there any decent literature on the extent to which the fact of knowing that my shoelaces are untied is a real property of the universe? Clearly it has measurable consequences - it will result in a predictable action taking place with a high probability. Saying 'I predict that when someone will tie his shoelaces when he sees they're undone' is based not on the shoelaces being untied, nor on the photons bouncing, but on this abstract concept of them knowing. Is there a mathematical basis for stating that the universe has measurably changed in a nonrandom way once those photons' effects are analysed? I'd love to read more on this.

This was a comment from the original post, and I agree with this sentiment. There was no response, so I'm wondering if anyone can answer this question now.

Note: I don't know who the author is because I have Kibitzing on in Chrome and for some reason I cannot turn it off right now.