= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
sixes_and_sevens comments on The beginnings of a test for Rationality Quotient - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (22)
Most of these were familiar to me, but I'm not sure of the basis or assessment criteria for this one:
My smartarse answer would be "1 minus epsilon", but as far as I can see, the only informative classes of answer in fitting with the cited measurement paradigms are either "1" or "< 1". Is that it?
I hate "gotcha" questions. How can we know that we have equivalent priors unless they are explicitly stated? And how can you establish probabilities without known priors?
what?