Laoch comments on The beginnings of a test for Rationality Quotient - Less Wrong

16 Post author: lukeprog 07 September 2011 08:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (22)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Laoch 08 September 2011 08:26:39AM 0 points [-]

Isn't rationality just a subset skill of the general intelligence encapsulated by the brain, intelligence being the set of skills your brain can handle or the processing power of the brain? Just curious as I would see some who is relatively more rational as just more generally intelligent. Essentially is intelligence processing power? And are labels like RQ, IQ, EQ just different ways of demarking[sic] the tasks that a particular brain is good at handling?

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 13 September 2011 03:10:03PM 4 points [-]

Intelligence is the raw processing power of brain. It is biological; it remains more or less constant during adult life. It is like a brain speed and short-term memory capacity. Computer analogy: processor frequency and RAM memory. IQ tests are trying to measure this brain power, not a specific skill. Different IQ tests may use different types of simple tasks, and yet their results highly correlate.

Rationality is how you use your brain. It can be learned (and LW is trying to teach it). Computer analogy: software with its features and bugs. Rationality allows you to reach nontrivial goals, where the raw brain power is not enough, it must be also used properly. Without rationality, you can expend a lot of mental energy and yet never reach your goals, as if you are running quickly but in a wrong direction.

EQ measures a specific area of skills.

In a very simplified metaphor, I would say that in a landscape of thoughts intelligent people "explore quickly" and rational people "navigate carefully". Low intelligence + low rationality = stays at the start or slowly follows the mob. High intelligence + low rationality = runs wildly everywhere, sometimes falls in a pit and cannot move from there (see Mensa). High intelligence + high rationality = avoids dangerous places and walks towards a distant goal.

Comment author: emmaoster 26 June 2013 09:55:08PM 0 points [-]

And what about low intelligence + high rationality?? What does that equal to?

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 27 June 2013 12:38:17PM *  0 points [-]

Not sure how much that combination is possible; whether some degree of intelligence is not necessary to be able to follow the rules of rationality.

But if it is possible, then "low intelligence + high rationality" would be going in the right direction, just very slowly. Then it would depend on the specific situation, on the distance to the specific goal, whether going slowly one has enough time to reach the goal and benefit from reaching it.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 27 June 2013 01:48:53PM *  0 points [-]

The Millionaire Next Door might be an example of average intelligence, high rationality. These are people who are unusually good at remembering their goal and doing reasonable things to achieve it.