PhilGoetz comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 9 - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Oscar_Cunningham 09 September 2011 01:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (718)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 25 September 2011 05:23:15AM *  2 points [-]

Tiled in pentagons? That I want to see. Or... not. Probably not.

Comment author: Nornagest 25 September 2011 06:05:45AM 8 points [-]

I actually looked that up on my last reread. It turns out there are several known pentagon tilings, some of which are quite attractive, although of course none use regular pentagons.

Comment author: Plasmon 25 September 2011 08:20:06AM 7 points [-]

You may also be interested in Uniform tilings in the hyperbolic plane. In this non-euclidean plane, regular pentagon tiling is possible, and, using some mapping to Euclidean space, aesthetically pleasing pictures may be produced.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 25 September 2011 03:31:13PM 6 points [-]

So we may presume the hallway in question had a vaulted ceiling.

Comment author: bogdanb 15 October 2011 01:06:32PM 4 points [-]

Or that Hogwarts is doing funny things with space, which we know it does regularly.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 26 December 2011 02:02:55PM 4 points [-]

I was being careful to include at least one logical impossibility in the story so that my writing it could not increase its measure.

Comment author: jimrandomh 26 December 2011 08:08:43PM 6 points [-]

I don't think that actually works. At most, you've reduced the measure increase by the inverse-exponential length of the shortest program that rewrites in a way that undoes the impossibility. What kind of serial fiction extrapolating simulator lacks that as a builtin feature, but still works?

Comment author: Sniffnoy 26 December 2011 09:49:33PM 2 points [-]

But as others have pointed out, that just indicates that that section of Hogwarts is negatively curved. Of course, you say "at least one", so...