Anubhav comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 9 - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Oscar_Cunningham 09 September 2011 01:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (718)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Anubhav 19 February 2012 12:20:56PM *  3 points [-]

"Oh, the little fiddly things?" said Dumbledore. "They came with the Headmaster's office and I have absolutely no idea what most of them do. Although this dial with the eight hands counts the number of, let's call them sneezes, by left-handed witches within the borders of France, you would not believe how much work it took to nail that down."

Chapter 17.

I know it's supposed to be a joke, but.... How? Is Dumbledore monitoring every wizard and witch's sex life? And how did he manage to crunch that data? Do wizards have calculating machines?

Or maybe he meant to say "the documentation took a lot of work to find and decipher"?

ETA: If it was Rowling writing this, the 'device with the golden wibblers' mentioned in the very next sentence would become a major plot point later in the series.

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 21 February 2012 04:20:20PM *  15 points [-]

Eh, it was probably a given from the start that it was counting something.

Then immediately after the French Ministry of Magic authorizes/legalizes a new "Give yourself multiple orgasms" charm, or even just a new magical Viagra, the device's count jumps up. At that point Dumbledore knows it's counting something that correlates strongly with sexual satisfaction, but the count is a bit too low to be counting the orgasms of the entire French female magical population. Turns out the inventor was a jealous French wizard who tried to keep tabs on his left-handed wife, but keyed in the criteria too weakly, so that any left-handed witch within the borders of France would do.

Comment author: Locke 19 February 2012 03:50:54PM *  4 points [-]

I find it more likely that he tinkered with the object itself, if that's even true.

I wonder if Quirrell could have managed to get a fiddly thing of his own invention into the headmaster's office before Dumbledore took over for Dipot. Perhaps as a gift to the old headmaster. It'd be an incredibly useful source of knowledge, if Wizards do in fact have magical listening devices.

Comment author: Anubhav 19 February 2012 04:17:59PM 1 point [-]

You'd expect the Headmaster's office to be laced with anti-eavesdropping charms.

Comment author: Locke 19 February 2012 05:39:19PM *  5 points [-]

How would that work, exactly? Would the Sorting Hat be unable to hear anything said in there? I should think not. And whatever doesn't work on the sorting hat probably wouldn't work on the instruments. Or what about all the portraits? There's some definite spying potential in the slytherin headmasters.

Comment author: gwern 19 February 2012 08:50:16PM 3 points [-]

Exactly. A recording device doesn't have to be actively broadcasting every thing; it could be just that Quirrel gets updates any time he is summoned to the headmaster's office. Untimely intel is better than no intel.

Comment author: wedrifid 20 February 2012 01:14:37PM *  1 point [-]

You'd expect the Headmaster's office to be laced with anti-eavesdropping charms.

Although when the Headmaster is Dumbledore who can control such things without aids with less than a flick of the finger or someone with the cunning to want to be selectively overheard the expectation is not quite so clear.

Comment author: Anubhav 20 February 2012 02:15:11PM 0 points [-]

Although when the Headmaster is Dumbledore who can control such things without aids with less than a flick of the finger or someone with the canny to want to be selectively overheard the expectation is not quite so clear.

..... what

What are you trying to say? Looks like a 'damn you autocorrect' moment to me... ('canny' isn't a noun, for instance)

Comment author: wedrifid 20 February 2012 02:36:18PM 1 point [-]

Eek. Somehow I changed from 'cunning' to 'savvy' mid-word!

Comment author: gwern 19 February 2012 08:49:09PM 2 points [-]

From context, I got the strong impression that the gadgets came with the office and Dumbledore is speaking about the work of deciphering what each one is measuring. If he was creating that device, why would he speak of the 8 hands as one of 'them', the 'they' that 'came with the Headmaster's office', most of which he has not figured out - except this one which records X...

Comment author: Anubhav 20 February 2012 02:18:51AM 4 points [-]

Um.... No, he didn't create them. It says right in the quote that they came with the office.

Question is.... How did he figure that one out? 'Number of orgasms by left-handed witches in France'; that isn't the kind of data you'd find written down somewhere.

Comment author: faul_sname 05 December 2012 02:15:30AM 0 points [-]

Not in 1993, anyway. You could probably find data to that effect today.

Comment author: TuviaDulin 05 March 2012 07:18:03PM 1 point [-]

I wonder if this is a reference to the movie "Amelie," with her seemingly supernatural ability to correctly guess how many orgasms are taking place in Paris at any given moment.

Comment author: SpaceFrank 28 February 2012 05:10:59AM 1 point [-]

Considering the ridiculous context of the rest of the conversation, (i.e. Dumbledore either pretending to be insane or actually letting some real insanity slip through) is it too far outside the realm of possibility for that comment to be a joke? It seemed like Dumbledore was going out of his way to screw with Harry in this chapter. Even if the machine actually does what he said it does, I could easily see the comment about "how much work it took to nail that down" being a joke Dumbledore told for his own amusement, knowing that Harry was too young to "get it".

Comment author: pedanterrific 28 February 2012 07:49:49AM 4 points [-]

"how much work it took to nail that down"

Now I get it!

...(Yuck.)

Comment author: Anubhav 28 February 2012 01:16:34PM 0 points [-]

rofl

Hadn't caught that before.

Comment author: moritz 21 February 2012 03:57:51PM 1 point [-]

There are certainly some analytical charms that give you some sort of idea how magical objects work. For example where Harry offers Dumbledore and Quirrel some Comed Tea, they both analyze it before drinking.

The complexity of such analytics probably scales withe complexity of the magical object that is being analyzed, so finding out about the dial was probably immensely difficult, but not by collecting and correlating data, but by inspecting the device rather closely.

Comment author: pedanterrific 23 February 2012 09:11:54PM *  3 points [-]

Not that I disagree, precisely, but I'm not sure you can use the Comed-Tea thing as evidence that it's possible to analyze how magical objects work: Quirrell and Dumbledore both seemed taken by surprise by the actual effect, after all. The charm(s) they used seem more likely to be poison/biologically-interactive-potion detectors.

Or maybe they both decided to fake being caught off guard. That seems like Dumbledore's style, anyway.

Comment author: bogdanb 03 April 2012 02:20:51PM 1 point [-]

Quirrell and Dumbledore both seemed taken by surprise by the actual effect, after all.

So was Draco, who had been told the effect; unlike Harry, he probably didn’t doubt that the thing worked, he probably just thought that it’d be lame.