sketerpot comments on Tool ideology - Less Wrong

25 Post author: PhilGoetz 09 September 2011 10:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: vi21maobk9vp 14 September 2011 08:04:57AM 3 points [-]

It looks like an estimation, not a VCS link.

Think of it this way: Vim undo history is a tree which you can walk visiting every branch (not that it's a thing you want to do). Now, writing all this data out has some cost in IO bandwidth - comparable to bandwidth of the keyboard, i.e. kBytes/minute. Vim users don't notice the cost of maintaining the tree in RAM.

Synchronising it at first opportunity is also not hard if you do it in the background and so latency can be tolerated most of the time.

The merges.. you can try to do them mostly on marked commits, and then they can be done just like they are done now.

But implementing all that is a great undertaking, to be sure.

Comment author: sketerpot 14 September 2011 11:29:12PM 2 points [-]

The limiting case of merge frequency is to do a branch and merge on every keystroke, and create something like Etherpad. This is completely practical.