FAWS comments on Case study: Folding@home - Less Wrong

12 Post author: gwern 15 September 2011 06:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (40)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: FAWS 15 September 2011 07:29:33PM 1 point [-]

Your inline divisions (?) show up like this in Chrome for me:

So what’s the right way then? Look at a very similar grid computing project, Rosetta@home. Rosetta@home has only 1175th the computing power of Folding@home and presumably consumes proportionately less electricity; hence it directly kills 1.01175 people a year and indirectly kills 12650175=72

Comment author: gwern 15 September 2011 07:33:51PM 1 point [-]

Yeah, that happens with Chrome.