The evidence is: In his description of conspiricies in part 1, he never even once mentiones the word evidence.
The map is not the territory.
He doesnt prove that what he considers to be a conspiricy theory IS infact either a theory
!
Without evidence to verify any of his own argument, he decends into fallacies
You didn't cite any. You didn't provide any reason to believe your claim.
miss representing the point.
The video's creator's name should be capitalized. Also, she prefers to be addressed as Miss Shirley Representing the Point.
~~~~~~~
Please read the material that is the background for many on this site if you are going to try to engage with the ideas here: Map and Territory), Words
Iksorod and I made a Google doc of intro-level training materials for rationality / critical thinking. We'll keep adding to it as we find more stuff. Please comment with your own additions.