Synaptic comments on Biopreservation (of the cells of nearly-extinct animals) in hopes that future tech can restore them - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Synaptic 26 September 2011 07:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 26 September 2011 09:07:21PM 3 points [-]

What does this remind you of? In what ways is it different, such that it can be published in a high status journal? Are those differences informative in any way?

It does not touch on religious or personal issues of personal identity and theory of mind and is aimed at 'victims' (endangered species); as well, it stays very close to existing applications and technology.

Comment author: Synaptic 26 September 2011 09:12:12PM 0 points [-]

Yes, I agree both of these matter. I wonder which one is more important?

Comment author: gwern 26 September 2011 09:21:07PM 2 points [-]

I'd guess close to existing applications & technology. If you flip either of the others, I don't see much of a backlash. Consider instead preserving stem cell from common species like dogs. Not much of a reaction there. Consider the suggestion that entire endanger species samples be frozen per cryonics; wouldn't people regard it as a waste of space? But again, not much of a reaction.