= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
JoshuaZ comments on Edward Nelson claims proof of inconsistency in Peano Arithmetic - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (115)
Any finite calculation of superexponentiation will be valid. But as I understand it you can't in general in Nelson's formulation prove that superexponentation is well-defined in general.