anonym comments on Rationality Quotes October 2011 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: MinibearRex 03 October 2011 06:41AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (532)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: anonym 02 October 2011 02:17:17AM 39 points [-]

Although this may seem a paradox, all exact science is dominated by the idea of approximation. When a man tells you that he knows the exact truth about anything, you are safe in inferring that he is an inexact man.

Bertrand Russell

Comment author: brazzy 03 October 2011 10:33:23AM 18 points [-]

Or a mathematician.

Comment author: Dojan 25 December 2011 02:26:32PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: [deleted] 25 December 2011 07:28:44PM 0 points [-]

I hope no-one takes the title-text of that as a challenge.

Comment author: wedrifid 25 December 2011 07:57:32PM 0 points [-]

I hope no-one takes the title-text of that as a challenge.

I actually did when I read it. If I ever get into an argument about the merits of racial segregation my speech is now prepared!

Comment author: anonym 04 October 2011 03:57:46AM 2 points [-]

He did say "all exact science", a phrasing I think he probably chose carefully, so I'd charitably interpret the remark as being about people uttering purported scientific truths.

Comment author: sketerpot 24 October 2011 02:50:52AM 1 point [-]

I think it's safe to say that Bertrand Russell knew about mathematicians, as he was one himself. :-)

Comment author: MixedNuts 31 October 2011 06:31:40PM 1 point [-]

Hydrogen atoms have exactly one proton.

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 31 October 2011 06:40:43PM 0 points [-]

What do you mean by "hydrogen atom" and "have" and "exactly" and "proton". ("One" I can deal with for now, but quantum physics makes the rest of your sentence meaningless (i.e. it makes your sentence an inexact high level description.))

Comment author: MixedNuts 31 October 2011 07:11:52PM 1 point [-]

By "proton" I mean a thingy that creates a potential well where an electron bops around, and by "hydrogen atom" I mean a single of these with a single electron in it, and by "have" I mean that when the electron has high enough energy you don't call it an hydrogen atom but "a proton here and an electron over there". This is of course a tautology.

By "one" I mean S(0) (and by "0" I mean the empty set), which is also a tautology. And if you don't know what I mean by "exactly" then you don't understand the parent quote anyway.

Admittedly a good counterexample would involve an exact truth that is not a tautology.

Comment author: Oligopsony 31 October 2011 07:44:23PM 4 points [-]

There are exactly zero unicorns.

Comment author: DoubleReed 31 October 2011 06:48:54PM 0 points [-]

But you can construct rigid, exact definitions for all of those things.

Though I suppose those definitions would have to be approximations. So Mathematics gets to have exactness to it, but of course Mathematics is typically not considered a science.