If you can have a 95% confidence interval, why can't you have a >50% confidence interval as well?
50% confidence intervals are standard practice. But not the point and not what I questioned.
There is no way in which my comment can be read which would make your reply make sense in the context.
This thread is for discussing anything that doesn't seem to deserve its own post.
If the resulting discussion becomes impractical to continue here, it means the topic is a promising candidate for its own thread.