wedrifid comments on Open thread, October 2011 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: MarkusRamikin 02 October 2011 09:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (308)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 17 October 2011 08:00:25AM 2 points [-]

Why single out race? There are other demographic factors that could count too: sex, age, social class ... and if a policy of "OK, conviction standards for blacks are lower" would be political suicide, a policy of "OK, conviction standards for working class people" would be even worse.

Even so such policies may indeed increase the accuracy of convictions, 1) they don't match our intuitions about justice, which I suspect would make people less happy, 2) judges and juries already take such factors into account (implicitly and approximately), so there's a risk of overcorrecting, and 3) energy would be much better spent increasing the accuracy of conviction with less ambiguous things like cameras, DNA tests, etc.

I do believe that such demographic data can be useful to help direct resources for crime prevention, though.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 October 2011 08:28:46AM 1 point [-]

There are other demographic factors that could count too: sex, age, social class ... and if a policy of "OK, conviction standards for blacks are lower" would be political suicide

Isn't that the status quo?

Comment author: Emile 17 October 2011 08:37:07AM 0 points [-]

Not explicitly, as far as I know (implicitly, possibly, hence what I said about over-correcting).

Comment author: wedrifid 17 October 2011 10:21:16AM 0 points [-]

Not explicitly, as far as I know

One would hope not.