JoshuaZ comments on Pascal's wager re-examined - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (117)
I have had a revelation.
A few minutes ago, as my algebraic geometry class finished up, something spoke to me. It identified itself as "not exactly a deity but close enough for all relevant purposes." It made a similar remark when I asked if we were in a simulation that it was running. It called itself "the Entity".
According to this Entity, it really likes to be believed in and worshiped. There is an afterlife run by this Entity. Moreover, the Entity will increase the utility it awards in the afterlife for worshiping it now to compensate for any genuine doubt it in its existence, promises or doctrines. It will similarly use extremely large punishments to compensate for any low probability estimates. It will also outbid all hypothetical/counterfactual deities which anyone considers in good faith.
Apparently the main ways the Entity wants to be worshiped are fourfold:
The Entity also announced that if any AI that was not a CEV implementer helped to implement a close approximation CEV it would compensate that AI by helping that AI achieves some of its goals.
Apparently further revelations as events warrant.
Algebraic geometry is known to make a mess of people's minds.