Vladimir_Nesov comments on Cryonics on Castle [Spoilers] - Less Wrong

25 Post author: wedrifid 04 October 2011 09:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 07 October 2011 09:06:28AM 2 points [-]

If you already think he believes something for a reason you believe is wrong, you don't have a very high opinion of his rationality.

If your goal is to improve, it's more important to notice and correct errors than deceive people about their absence. I believe it's insulting, not respectful, to attribute to a rationalist the attitude that they would prefer the knowledge of a flaw withheld.

(You might want to take a precaution of asking first if Crocker's rules apply, and communicate the bug report privately.)

Comment author: RobertLumley 07 October 2011 02:04:52PM 0 points [-]

I'm very confused. I wasn't talking about a bug report. Unless you mean bug in rationality.

Furthermore, I never attributed that attitude to JoshuaZ. JoshuaZ had no evidence that the flaw he proposed is wedrifid's thinking. He's just selecting one potential reason out of the whole set of potential reasons.