Konkvistador comments on Not By Empathy Alone - Less Wrong

19 Post author: gwern 05 October 2011 12:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 05 October 2011 02:57:04PM 4 points [-]

This seems like a bad idea. If the overall level of empathy is reduced, the result won't be more efficient charity, the result will less charity. Having money go to support the cute abused puppies is orders of magnitude less useful than having it go to say Village Reach, but it is still probably better than the money going to a lot of status symbols like gold necklaces, fancy cars, and the like.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 October 2011 01:03:53PM *  1 point [-]

Charity is a status symbol. Especially inefficient and extravagant charity.