Yeah, this is an important subject. I'll probably read your paper.
I've found a fairly simple and apparently workable solution
To what, exactly?
I fixed the second paragraph. I meant a "solution" to the challenge posed by the Hacking/White "inverse gambler's fallacy" argument, basically just an account of where exactly the argument goes wrong.
This is the fifth bimonthly What Are You Working On? thread. Previous threads are here. So here's the question:
What are you working on?
Here are some guidelines: