wedrifid comments on Mike Darwin on Steve Jobs's hypocritical stance towards death - Less Wrong

25 Post author: Synaptic 08 October 2011 03:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Craig_Heldreth 08 October 2011 05:56:26PM 1 point [-]

In my view the liver thing has gotten nowhere near the amount of coverage Mickey Mantle's did. And Mickey was just as widely respected and even hero-worshiped as Jobs. To me these are closely comparable cases. My memory may be distorted, but it seems to me that there is some zeitgeist shift.

I have a friend who cannot get a kidney transplant. His kidneys are failing and he is on dialysis and without a transplant his life expectancy is less than five years, but he is considered a poor prospect and can't get his name on a waiting list.

What Stallman said was uncharitable and mean-spirited. This I am not so sure. Livers are more precious than kidneys and to waste one is a really huge deal. (I do not know enough about medicine in general or Jobs case in particular to know about the accuracy of that wastage characterization.)

Comment author: wedrifid 09 October 2011 12:18:47AM 1 point [-]

In my view the liver thing has gotten nowhere near the amount of coverage Mickey Mantle's did. And Mickey was just as widely respected and even hero-worshiped as Jobs.

Never heard of him. I heard of Jobs, like, several hundred times.

Comment author: gwern 09 October 2011 01:44:49AM *  2 points [-]

I think it's a generational thing. When I mentioned it to my parents, they knew instantly what I was asking about and even knew the details of the Mantle thing. (Neither one is a pro sports fan, and their main familiarity is with football, not baseball.)

Comment author: wedrifid 09 October 2011 01:55:42AM 2 points [-]

Oh, so he is a US baseball player. We get more iPods over here than we do baseball. That explains it. Worldwide relevance.