wedrifid comments on [SEQ RERUN] Why Are Individual IQ Differences OK? - Less Wrong

11 Post author: MinibearRex 09 October 2011 03:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (119)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jack 09 October 2011 07:06:54AM 9 points [-]

Was this part of a "lets try to kill the minds of the bootcampers and see how they handle it" or did the subject just come up?

Comment author: wedrifid 09 October 2011 07:43:32AM 4 points [-]

Subject came up.

Comment author: Nisan 10 October 2011 04:29:18PM *  -1 points [-]

How did the subject come up? I have never ever heard this subject discussed outside of two contexts:

  • The question under discussion is "What can't we say?"; or

  • One of the interlocutors feels it's important to take civil rights away from people.

EDIT: To be absolutely clear, I'm certain the second thing is not true of any of the bootcampers, and I'm almost certain that racial IQ differences came up in conversation only as an example of something people don't consider rationally, not as a subject of interest in its own right.

Comment author: Jack 10 October 2011 06:55:01PM *  11 points [-]

Group differences in average IQ are relevant in discussions regarding whether or not policies and institutions that were successful in some jurisdictions should be recommended in other jurisdictions where the people have different genetic backgrounds. They can also legitimately arise in discussions about the evolution of intelligence.

How well the relevant groups in those discussions match folk notions of race, is another question. Some aspects of our folk racial categories seem obviously silly in this regard-- like how children of one white parent and one black parent are considered black.

Comment author: wedrifid 10 October 2011 06:01:18PM 6 points [-]

One of the interlocutors feels it's important to take civil rights away from people.

I have never seen that happen ever.

Comment author: juliawise 13 October 2011 01:52:21AM 2 points [-]

It comes up for people considering adopting kids.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 10 October 2011 05:20:21PM 5 points [-]

How did the subject come up? I have never ever heard this subject discussed outside of two contexts:

The question under discussion is "What can't we say?"; or

One of the interlocutors feels it's important to take civil rights away from people.

Well, since this is the first reference in this thread to "What can't we say?", which of the commenters would you say "feels it's important to take civil rights away from people"?

But seriously, you should get out of the habit of assuming sinister motives of people who disagree with you.

Comment author: Nisan 10 October 2011 06:41:19PM 2 points [-]

I feel like I've been misunderstood somehow.

Comment author: Kingreaper 12 October 2011 09:22:58PM *  1 point [-]

Ummm, Eliezer Yudkowsky's post, on which this discussion is based, is about "What can't we say?" ie. why can't we say there are racial differences in IQ.

So this thread doesn't seem to be evidence against Nisan's statement.