PhilGoetz comments on A Rational Approach to Fashion - Less Wrong

19 Post author: lionhearted 10 October 2011 06:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (95)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 14 October 2011 08:23:20PM 3 points [-]

I've subscribed to GQ and Details, and looked at other fashion magazines, and they are useless. They just show outfits, or particular items, and pile superlatives on them ('snazzy', 'retro', 'bold', 'understated', etc.). But they give no clue as to why one thing is better than another.

One theory to explain this is that women have some kind of holistic thinking that lets them make use of this kind of information - that by just looking at a bunch of examples they can pick out what the rules are - and that fashion magazine writing culture teaches how to write for women.

Useful writing on fashion for men is mostly about suits, which I avoid as much as possible because I hate wearing a tie.

Comment author: jkaufman 14 October 2011 09:06:48PM 0 points [-]

They just show outfits, or particular items, and pile superlatives on them. But they give no clue as to why one thing is better than another.

I suspect if you read them more you would pick up on the patterns. People are generally good at learning rules from labeled examples. You'd have to be interested enough to read a lot, though.

Comment author: dlthomas 14 October 2011 09:08:42PM 0 points [-]

Provided the patterns are well defined...