lessdazed comments on Things you are supposed to like - Less Wrong

68 Post author: PhilGoetz 22 October 2011 02:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (367)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lessdazed 22 October 2011 04:50:11AM 4 points [-]

In my view, even if we were much, much better, smarter versions of ourselves, aesthetic judgment would continue to vary as widely as the combined variance of human cultures and the traits of individuals.

Even if we were much, much smarter versions of ourselves, intellectual judgment would continue to vary widely.

But there wouldn't be creationists.

Comment author: Prismattic 22 October 2011 05:04:38AM 5 points [-]

Yes there would. Much, much smarter != freed from cognitive biases.

Comment author: lessdazed 22 October 2011 07:44:09AM 4 points [-]

Granted there would be religious people, I do not think there would be creationists. Granted for the sake of argument a few people sufficiently smart are now creationists, were everyone that smart, the community of creationists might shrink until having such opinions about biology would be as isolating as analogous literalist Biblical opinions about the "four corners of the Earth". Absent a supporting community, only seriously deluded smart people, such as might also think themselves Napoleon, would be creationists.