play_therapist comments on Why would we think artists perform better on drugs ? - Less Wrong

13 Post author: kilobug 30 October 2011 02:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: play_therapist 30 October 2011 04:44:07PM 3 points [-]

Those great artists who were or are known to be mentally ill or drug users make for interesting news stories and articles. That probably creates the impression that it's more common than it is. Also, the life style of successful artists some times encourages drug use. In some cases the artist might be great despite the use of drugs rather than with the help of drugs.

Jimrandomh makes a good point about not lumping all drugs together. That is, also, true of mental illness. Take bipolar disorder, for example. Van Gogh is thought to have had it. He probably produced large quantities of work during manic phases, but then he took his own life in a depressive phase. Those who suffer from severe depression or anxiety probably are not very productive.

Comment author: Desrtopa 01 November 2011 04:50:50AM 0 points [-]

Well, when I think of "artists suffering from severe depression," I immediately think of Sylvia Plath, but one specimen doesn't make a representative sample.