DoubleReed comments on Rhetoric for the Good - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (289)
Personally, I'm very much against the idea of writing down "whatever horrible shit comes out of you." Maybe it's me personally. I think it's faster to actually outline, revise, develop, revise, etc. in a much more cyclical manner. Planning can break the looming threat of writer's block. Quite often, I won't have enough ideas to start to get anywhere in a worthwhile manner.
Instead, I want to flesh out the major ideas and develop them as much as I can along the entirety of your work. Write out parts here and there to determine what the direction of the development is.
Ideas are comparatively cheap. It's the development and details of ideas that can be difficult. So you need to give yourself room to make those developments.
Creators seem to cluster as conceptual or experimental. Conceptual creators work well with outlines; experimental creators work well with revisions.
&
Is that... what I think it is?
A How I Met Your Mother reference?
Never watched it. Looks like a pile of doody to me (the ampersand, not the show).
In a recent episode, it was revealed that the characters text each other symbols representing what their poop looks like.
P(A|B)=P(B|A)P(A)/P(B)
The inevitable result of a Dutch breakfast.
"I'm so rational, I shit Bayes Theorem"?
That would be the Best. Eliezer Yudkowsky Fact. Ever.